As good as a stab in the dark
I came upon this Disease Risk Index page at Harvard.edu
I was intrigued and wanted to see what it would say about my risk of cancer, and see if the test is accurate or remotely accurate. However, I was dismayed when I had to answer “yes” to the 2nd question, which in essence screws up the entire survey and prove the survey useless. Also, the list of cancer was limited. (I did not look at the other diseases)
The whole bit about cancer is that, you (you as in, anyone and everyone) just don’t effin know if you will get it or not. There are too many exceptions, preventing any real cause/effect scenarios, hypotheses or theories to be drawn. You could be as healthy for your entire life (like me), and bam! the next thing you know, they’re tell you about your new cancer diagnose. Or you could be a chimney, chain, nonstop smoker / second hand smoking / whatever else, and you never ever get sick from anything. Ever.
It’s like playing Russian Roulette.
Oh sure the assessments might work for some people. But for the majorities, I think it’s a crap shoot.

Christine Said,
March 17, 2008 @ 7:33 pm
I agree, a total crap shoot and when it makes its appearance it is like you have been given the crappy end of the stick in this thing called life. No…I take that back. You can wash sh…t off!
Christine’s last blog post..The Return of the pitiful and Wretched Child
archana Said,
March 17, 2008 @ 10:19 pm
definitely agreed. the reason it makes me most grumpy is that it has produced a complete mistrust of statistics. if you were ever in a minority pool of stats, then hearing things like “85% likelihood” no longer means anything… because you’re all too aware of that other 15%.
here’s to screwing cancer and all the baggage that comes with it
archana’s last blog post..crazy is as crazy does.